3rd District Issues
Agriculture
Education Reform
Faith-Based Organizations
Health Care
Homeland Security
Illegal Drugs
International Relations
Iraq
Job Creation
Medicare
Prescription Drugs
Protecting the Ozarks
Retirement Security
Second Amendment
Tax Relief
Trade
Transportation
Values Legislation
Veterans' Affairs
War on Terror
Water Quality
 
Testifying in Support of the 188th
View Photo
 
Visiting with Military Families
View Photo
More photos Congressman Boozman and the people of the Third District
Home / Blog / Blog 

Higher taxes are good [not really, but thank goodness for these brackets]
by Boozman Press Office
October 29th, 2007

Apparently the Washington press corps needed some extra help in deciphering whether Speaker Pelosi supports the “Mother of All Tax Hikes.”

Following the unveiling of arguably the most politically explosive domestic policy bill of the 110th Congress last Thursday, Pelosi seemed to wholeheartedly support the tax overhaul authored by Ways and Means Committee Chairman Rangel.

I certainly support his plan,” Pelosi (D-Calif.) said to the assembled reporters.

But when the transcript of the briefing came out, words were inserted — highlighted by brackets — clarifying that she supported his goal, if not his specific proposals.

The final transcript read: “I certainly support his plan [to begin tax reform.]

The distinction is an important one. Rangel was immediately criticized by the GOP as he announced his highly controversial tax plan and Republicans started trying to tie the plan to Pelosi and the Democratic leadership.

Well, that certainly makes sense [not really, but we’ll just wink and nod like we do].

Permalink |



This entry was posted on Monday, October 29th, 2007 at 10:27 pm and is filed under Congress, Democrats, House, Taxes. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

One Response to “Higher taxes are good [not really, but thank goodness for these brackets]”

  1. Boozman Blog Says:

    […] Wonder if this statement will be [redacted]. […]

Leave a Reply