Fully-funded withdrawal
by Boozman Press Office
March 8th, 2007
A new proposal would grant $100 billion to fighting of the War on Terror - with strings.
The basics: Democrat leaders are looking at a “fully-funded withdrawal.”
One report says the troops could be yanked by July 1.
Another report says Fall 2008.
Meanwhile, in the Senate, they’re talking next year.
Anyone confused, or is it just us?
BTW, the President has promised a veto.
Permalink |
This entry was posted
on Thursday, March 8th, 2007 at 6:15 pm and is filed under Congress, Democrats, House, Iraq, Uncategorized.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Leave a Reply
March 15th, 2007 at 9:30 am
[…] It’s part of the Democrat-written fully-funded withdrawal from Iraq. […]
March 19th, 2007 at 9:43 am
[…] We can understand Chairwoman Wasserman Shultz’ desire for a clean supplemental (too bad others in the Caucus don’t see it that way), it’s just the fact that peanuts, spinach and citrus apparently are more important to fighting terrorists than giving the Capitol Police better communications gear. But Rep. Zach Wamp (R-Tenn.), who submitted the amendment at the supplemental markup, said that waiting until 2008 to begin modernizing the radios puts the Capitol at risk. […]
March 26th, 2007 at 6:52 pm
Wangt to know when the congress and senate are going to stop attaching item’s to Military spending that are not military relaited.