Hill Web Sites Lauded and Criticized
Washington,
Jan 14, 2008 -

By Elizabeth Brotherton
Roll Call Staff
January 14, 2008
No writers strike is going to stop the unveiling of these awards.
The Congressional Management Foundation officially releases its
“Gold Mouse Report” today, recognizing Member, committee and leadership
offices that best use their Web sites as constituent communication
tools.
About 17 percent of the Web sites earned an A in 2007,
garnering a gold, silver or bronze mouse award from the nonprofit,
nonpartisan group. But the report also found that the overall quality
of Member Web sites continues to be disappointing — one-third of the
618 Congressional sites studied did not have a functional search
engine, for example.
“We’re disappointed that there hasn’t been improvement en
masse,” said Tim Hysom, CMF’s director of communication and technology
services. “The connection hasn’t been made that having a Congressional
Web site is a constituent service.”
CMF funded the study with a grant provided by the National
Science Foundation and conducted it alongside the John F. Kennedy
School of Government at Harvard University, the University of
California at Riverside and Ohio State University. It is the fourth
time that CMF has issued the review; similar reports were released in
2002, 2003 and 2006.
“It is clear that the Internet has played an important role in
mobilizing and informing voters,” said David Lazer, director of
Harvard’s Program on Networked Governance at the JFK school. “Most
Members have not seized the day.”
It’s not all dire — the 2007 report does show some improvement
from 2006, when only 14 percent of sites earned awards. But those that
scored badly in the past continued to struggle.
About 63 percent of Member sites that received a D in 2006 got
a D or slipped to an F in the 2007 report. Half of the sites that
earned an F last year received the same grade this year.
But while most Members’ Web sites continue to lag, what did improve in the 110th Congress is encouraging, Hysom said.
Top-tier Web sites continued to do well, with 44 percent of the
2006 award winners earning another honor this year, and eight Member
sites even scored higher than the highest-scoring sites last year.
Freshman Members did particularly well and 16 percent even earned an A.
Things are better in the Senate, where staffs generally are
larger and have more resources to manage their Web sites than in the
House, Hysom said. The most common letter grade given in the Senate was
a B compared with a D in the House.
Party-wise, Democrats fared better than Republicans. Sixty-one
percent of Democratic sites earned a grade of C or higher, compared
with 55 percent of Republican sites. Those numbers show a big change
from 2006, when GOPers had the edge.
“The biggest lesson, and the reason we highlighted the
freshmen, is that it’s not rocket science,” Hysom said. “You can come
in and in pretty short order develop a quality Web site.”
Members don’t need a bunch of blogs or video feeds, Hysom said
(although those features add flash). Instead, Members should focus on
uploading accurate, timely content in a well-organized format, he said.
The report shows that about 57 percent of Member Web sites
lacked information about legislative issues with a particular local
interest, which is arguably the No. 1 reason constituents visit Member
sites to begin with.
Twenty-six percent of sites didn’t have links to sponsored or
co-sponsored legislation, and of those that did, 23 percent did not
reference the current Congressional session.
That is the type of information that can be managed without significant resources, Hysom said.
“It has to be a priority in the office,” he said. “Offices who
have good Web sites often don’t think of the Web site as an
afterthought.”
CMF officials spoke with staffers in Congressional offices that
are the most frequently honored to provide tips for Members on how to
create better Web sites, Hysom said. Everybody seemed to agree that the
entire office must be involved for a Web site to function properly, he
said.
“It’s really important for an office to have somebody from the
top who understands the value of online communications, whether that’s
the Member itself or a chief of staff,” Hysom said. “There really has
to be leadership who is driving that.”
Gold award winner Rep. John Boozman (R-Ark.) does just that, according to Ryan James, his communications director.
“He’s a very big believer in using as many formats as possible
to kind of get the word out,” James said. “He’s a real big proponent of
using the Internet, because one of the benefits of it is that it is a
direct link to the constituents.”
Boozman is frequently listed among the Members who send out the
least amount of mailings because he has developed such a positive
presence online, said James, who as communications chief is charged
with managing the site.
The focus is clearly on constituents. There is a series of
links under the heading “constituent services” in the upper-left corner
of the site, a way to help Arkansans via the Web. CMF also honored the
site for the amount of legislative content it features, from bills to
Congressional Research Service reports to news releases.
All of that has led to “a distinct ramp-up” in people using Boozman’s site in the past several years, James said.
“Electronic is just a cheaper way to do it,” James said. “It can reach people who are truly interested.”
Other Members who earned gold awards were Reps. Tom Allen
(D-Maine), Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.), Xavier Becerra (D-Calif.), Ginny
Brown-Waite (R-Fla.), Dan Burton (R-Ind.), Christopher Carney (D-Pa.),
Bud Cramer (D-Ala.), Brad Ellsworth (D-Ind.), Anna Eshoo (D-Calif.),
Mike Ferguson (R-N.J.), Randy Forbes (R-Va.), Virginia Foxx (R-N.C.),
Mike Honda (D-Calif.), John Linder (R-Ga.), Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.),
Ed Markey (D-Mass.), Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), Jerry Moran (R-Kan.),
Patrick Murphy (D-Pa.), Frank Pallone (D-N.J.), Paul Ryan (R-Wis.),
Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), Hilda Solis (D-Calif.), Cliff Stearns (R-Fla.)
and Mike Thompson (D-Calif.).
Sens. John Cornyn (R-Texas), Chris Dodd (D-Conn.), Orrin Hatch
(R-Utah) and John Thune (R-S.D.) all earned gold honors, as did the Web
site of the House Republican Conference. The House Judiciary, Science
and Technology, and Ways and Means committees, as well as the Senate
Energy and Natural Resources, and minority Environment and Public Works
committees Web sites also earned gold honors.